Legal Opinion

United States v. Omar Dominguez-Valencia

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 17, 2015No. 13-50072Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Omar Dominguez-Valencia appeals his conviction following a bench trial and sentence for attempted entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

1. The district court did not err in denying Dominguez-Valencia’s motion under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d) to dismiss the indictment. A claim that a defect in a previous removal proceeding prevents reliance on the final removal order in a later 8 U.S.C. § 1326 proceeding is reviewed de novo. United States v. Reyes-Bonilla, 671 F.3d 1036, 1042 (9th Cir.2012). We review the district…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. United States v. Isidro Ubaldo-FigueroaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Juan Manuel Muro-InclanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Barajas-AlvaradoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Reyes-BonillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API