Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. Merritt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
MAXES, C.
We have given this ease a great deal of attention and study. We have read the entire testimony and the briefs of the respective parties and given the cases cited due consideration, and have reached the conclusion that the trial court erred in not sustaining the demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence, and in not sustaining the motion to direct a verdict at the close of all of the testimony. There are certain duties devolving upon the railroad company in cases of this character and a corresponding duty rests upon those who have occasion to cross the tracks of a railroad company.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Railroad Company v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Elliott v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- McDonald v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Solts v. Southwestern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Missouri Pac. Ry. Co v. MoseleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. WithersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co. v. FlowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Hopkins v. KurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.