State v. Disanto
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Defendant told several people of his intent to murder his former girlfriend and her new boyfriend. Unknown to defendant, his design was revealed to the authorities and they had a police officer pose as a contract killer to interject himself in the plan. Defendant and the “hit man” discussed the murders, wherein defendant wanted each victim shot twice in the head. He directed the feigned killer to the former girlfriend’s address, gave him a picture of her, provided details on what valuables could be obtained during the killings, instructed him to kill a child witness…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. StaulaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- State v. GuthrieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. TofaniSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. PackedSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KlaudtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. Plenty HorseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.