Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Candee Construction Co. v. South Dakota Department of Transportation

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1989No. 16552, 16553 and 16558Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSabers, Justice

I concur except that I dissent on that part of issue 4 which relates to the disqualification of Candee to bid on a third highway construction project in the Black Hills, entitled project 41. The ruling on this matter by the trial court and the majority is premature. Granting summary judgment on one issue is proper only where that issue is “clearly distinct from the issues on which factual questions [remain].” Stetler v. Fosha, 9 Kan.App.2d 519, 521, 682 P.2d 682, 685 (1984).

Courts in other jurisdictions have found error where summary judgment was granted on an issue which depended for its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bego v. GordonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Groseth International, Inc. v. Tenneco, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Villa Charlotte Bronte, Inc. v. Commercial Union InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Stetler v. FoshaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
  5. Van Knight Steel Erection, Inc. v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API