Legal Opinion
State in Interest of Af
Utah Supreme Court
Decided August 24, 2007No. 20060648PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Chief Justice:
BACKGROUND
{1 When AF. (the Child) was born on August 28, 2004, urine tests showed that he had methamphetamine in his system, and C.M.F. (the Mother) admitted that she had used the drug the day before. The Division of Child and Family Services (the Division) removed the Child from the Mother's eusto-dy four days later. The juvenile court subsequently established the Child's primary permanency goal as reunification and ordered reunification services and compliance with the service plan. At the permanency hearing held eight months after the Child's removal from the Mother's…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- D.A. v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. M.W.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
- Hardinger v. KimberlyUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Cahoon v. CahoonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Office of the Guardian ad Litem v. H.M.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State ex rel. K.F. v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. A.C.M.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
- K.F. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
- State Ex Rel. KfUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- State Ex Rel. A.K.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.