McCarroll Agency, Inc. v. Protectory for Boys Under the Care of the Franciscan Bros. of Cincinnati
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtMehaeey, J.
This suit was begun by appellant, and the original complaint named Poor Brothers of St. Francis, Inc., as defendant. Answer was filed in which it was admitted that appellant was a corporation, but it was denied that the appellee was incorporated, and denied that it owned any property. It was alleged .in the answer that the corporation which owns the property and operates the school is known as the “Protectory for Boys under the care of the Franciscan Brothers of Cincinnati, Ohio.” Thereafter, the appellee was made party defendant.
The appellant alleged that on March 6, 1929, the ap-pellee…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Southern Trust Co. v. McKeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Ozark Mutual Life Association v. DillardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Sternberg v. Snow King Baking Powder CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- The Travelers Ins. Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. StephensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arnold v. All American Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Brown v. Maryland Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Johnson v. MosleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Taylor v. ConnellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Buck v. Woodhull (In Re Woodhull)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.