Legal Opinion

Running v. United States

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided January 27, 2015No. 3:13-CV-03007-RALPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING IN PART MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255 AND ORDERING THE PARTIES TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD

ROBERTO A. LANGE, District Judge.

Phillip Running, a federal inmate serving a 120-month sentence for producing child pornography, United States v. Run*784ning, 10-CR-30067-RAL, Doc. 39,1 has filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence, Running v. United States, 13-CV-3007-RAL, Doc. 1.2 The Government opposes Running’s motion, arguing that he is not entitled to relief on any of his claims. CIV Doc. 18. For the reasons explained below, Running’s…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Quevedo v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API