Running v. United States
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING IN PART MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255 AND ORDERING THE PARTIES TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD
ROBERTO A. LANGE, District Judge.
Phillip Running, a federal inmate serving a 120-month sentence for producing child pornography, United States v. Run*784ning, 10-CR-30067-RAL, Doc. 39,1 has filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence, Running v. United States, 13-CV-3007-RAL, Doc. 1.2 The Government opposes Running’s motion, arguing that he is not entitled to relief on any of his claims. CIV Doc. 18. For the reasons explained below, Running’s…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Quevedo v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2022