Legal Opinion

Goes v. Gage County

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1903No. 12,539PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Eimou, from the district court, for Gage county. Action, in the nature of case, against a municipal corporation charged with the repair of highways (as was alleged) for injury received in the death of a mare, the property of plaintiff, in said county. Plaintiff below sued for $75, the alleged value of the mare. Tried helow before Letton, J., upon an agreed statement of facts, without the intervention of a jury. Finding and judgment for defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, O.

This suit was commenced by the plaintiff in error against Gage county to recover the sum of $75 on account of damages alleged to have been sustained by Mm for the loss *617of a mare, injured while traveling upon a public road or highway situated in that county. A jury was waived, and the cause was submitted to the district court on a stipulation or agreed statement of facts which is as follows:

“First, that the defendant, the county of Gage, is a municipal corporation, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the general laws of the state of Nebraska, and is a county within…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Franek v. Butler CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Clingan v. Dixon CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Franek v. Butler CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Franek v. Butler CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Opinion No. (1982), Nebraska Attorney General Reports1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API