Legal Opinion

H. G. Adair Printing Co. v. Ames

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1936No. 23598. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shaw

The H. G. Adair Printing Company, a corporation, and others, filed a complaint in the circuit court of Cook county against the Director of Finance and the Attorney General of the State to enjoin them from instituting or prosecuting any suit or proceeding against the complainants to compel them to make returns to the Department of Finance of gross receipts from their, vocation of printers by reason of the provisions of the Retailers’ Occupation Tax act and Rule 36 of the Department of Finance, adopted in pursuance of the act. A motion by the defendants to dismiss the complaint was overruled…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. J. A. Burgess Co. v. AmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Wm. H. Wise & Co. v. Rand McNally & CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  3. Crescent Amusement Co. v. CarsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Ingersoll Milling MacHine Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Booth v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API