In Re the Will of Tenner
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
G.S. 31-5.3 provides that “a will is revoked by the subsequent marriage of the maker, except as follows. . . .” The two exceptions set forth in the statute do not apply in the instant proceeding.
The contention of the propounders is that when a man marries a woman subsequent to making his will, that G. S. 31-5.3 does not revoke the will in its entirety, but revokes it only to the extent necessary to permit the wife to share in his estate as if her husband had died intestate, and otherwise his will is to remain in full force and effect. Pursuant to their theory of the law, they assign as errors…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sinclair v. TravisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- In Re Will of WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- In Re the Will of CoffieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Means v. Ury.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Sawyer v. Sawyer's heirsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1859
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McCraw v. LlewellynSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- In Re Probate of Will of MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- In Re Probate of Will of MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973