Legal Opinion
Fortney v. Walmart, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 11, 2022No. 2:19-cv-04209Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION DAVID FORTNEY, et al, : Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:19-cv-4209 v. Judge Sarah D. Morrison Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson WALMART, INC., : Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER This suit was filed as a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and as a Rule 23 class action under Ohio’s wage and hour laws. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) The matter is before the Court on Defendant Walmart, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Claims of Out-of-State Opt-Ins.1 (Mot., ECF No. 137.) Plaintiffs oppose Walmart’s Motion and move to transfer…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Allen King v. Eric TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Mobile Anesthesiologists Chicago, LLC v. Anesthesia Associates of Houston Metroplex, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Mary C. McKenzie v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc., D/B/A South Central Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Gerber v. RiordanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.