Legal Opinion
People v. Mateo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 8, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), rendered February 19, 2002, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s unpreserved contention, the Supreme Court’s supplemental charge on circumstantial evidence did not deprive him of a fair trial. The supplemental charge conveyed a correct statement of the law (see People v Geraci, 85 NY2d 359, 369 [1995]; People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428, 442 [1985];…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. BenzingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. GeraciNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. BrabhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. ChianeseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. MateoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004