Legal Opinion

Claim of Keegan v. Kraft, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMahoney, J.

Appeals from a decision and an amended decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed October 9, 1991 and August 5, 1992, which, inter alia, excused claimant’s failure to provide notice of her injury as required by Workers’ Compensation Law § 18.

While claimant did not give her employer written notice that she had sustained a job-related accident within 30 days after the occurrence, as required under Workers’ Compensation Law § 18, and delayed until approximately seven months after the accident, we find that substantial evidence supports the determination of the Workers’ Compensation Board…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Cortese v. Rochester Products Division, G.M.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Claim of Yagaloff v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thousand v. Human Resources AdministrationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Claim of McCarthy v. Verizon WirelessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Claim of McNichols v. New York City Department of CorrectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. Hollenbeck v. Hollenbeck & DaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API