Legal Opinion
Hollenbeck v. Hollenbeck & Dailey
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 18, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
Appeal from an amended decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed August 26, 2002, which ruled, inter aha, that the workers’ compensation carrier was not prejudiced by claimant’s late notice.
Claimant, vice-president and a laborer for a family-owned roofing business, filed for workers’ compensation benefits after being injured in an unwitnessed fall. While the accident occurred on September 15, 2000, his claim for compensation was dated November 14, 2000 and filed on November 24, 2000. An employer’s report of injury dated November 15, 2000 was filed on November 27, 2000. The workers’…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Claim of Nebenhaus v. Lydmark Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Claim of Dempster v. United Parcel ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Claim of Keegan v. Kraft, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Claim of Pollack v. LingerieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Claim of Yagaloff v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Claim of Miller v. North Shore University HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Claim of McNichols v. New York City Department of CorrectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Matter of McElroy v. Siena Coll.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Matter of Horvath v. Mega ForkliftAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019