Legal Opinion

Cummins v. City of West Linn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 9, 1975No. 82981PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

Plaintiff charged negligence on the part of the city (1) in maintaining an inadequate sewer system; (2) in failing to install equipment that would check sewage backflow; and (3) in failing to warn that defendant’s sewer system was inadequate. The city made a general denial and affirmative defense that plaintiff had illegally attached roof drains to his sewer outflow. For want of other evidence of negligence, plaintiff urged the theory of res ipsa loquitur. Plaintiff appeals from judgment of involuntary non-suit and the denial of his motion for new trial. We reverse.

The plaintiff’s proof was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Jesionowski v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Pakos v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Gow v. Multnomah Hotel, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Kaufman v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jivelekas v. City of WorlandWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  2. CITY OF NEW SMYRNA BEACH, ETC. v. McWhorterSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  3. Fieux v. Cardiovascular & Thoracic Clinic, P.C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Hughes v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API