Legal Opinion

N. E. Redlon Co. v. Franklin Square Corp.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 2, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

I. The defendant urges that under the contract arbitration of disputed questions was a condition precedent to legal action. Article 40 of the Standard Documents provides that “All questions subject to arbitration under this Contract shall be submitted to arbitration at the choice of either party to the dispute .... The demand for arbitration shall be filed in writing with the Architect.” The referee ruled that the contract did not require arbitration unless called for by one of the parties. This was a correct interpretation of the contract.

The plaintiff first suggested arbitration and on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co. v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Logic Associates, Inc. v. Time Share Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  2. Terminal Const. Corp. v. Bergen, Etc., AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  3. Tothill v. Richey Insurance Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Gulezian v. ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API