Legal Opinion

Cramer v. PEMCO INSURANCE

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 12, 1992No. 29584-5-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtForrest, J.

Mondell and Vicky Cramer appeal the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Public Employees Mutual Insurance Company (PEMCO) on the Cramers' claim for underinsured motorist benefits for Vicky's loss of consortium arising out of an automobile accident in which Mondell was struck by a third party. We affirm.

On July 15, 1987, Mondell Cramer was involved in an automobile accident with a vehicle driven by Steven Am-hold. Amhold was insured by Farmers Insurance Group (Farmers) under a liability insurance policy with a limit of $25,000.

The Cramers settled for the available limits under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keenan v. INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY INS. CO. OF NORTHWESTWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lundgren v. Whitney's Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Robinson v. HamedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hooper v. Yakima CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  2. Matter of Marriage of McDanielCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API