Legal Opinion

Mount Ida School, Inc. v. Gilman

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 9, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action op Contract. Plea, the general issue with notice of special defenses. Trial by jury at the December Term, 1919, Caledonia County, Fish, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for defendants. The plaintiff excepted. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Moulton, Sup. J.

This is an action in contract brought to recover the balance claimed to be due for the tuition and board of the defendant Aleñe Gilman, at the plaintiff school, under a written contract providing for a year’s tuition, board and incidentals, for the inclusive sum of $600.

[1] The declaration was in the common counts and the case went to trial upon the general issue. At the close of the plaintiff’s case, the court directed a verdict in favor of the defendants, Daniel T. Gilman and Aleñe Gilman, and the case proceeded against the defendant, Nellie IT. Gilman. The defendants,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vermont Marble Co. v. EastmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  2. James Smith Woolen Machine Co. v. HoldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901
  3. Dernier v. Rutland Railway, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1920
  4. Hambleton v. Aja Granite Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  5. Cutler & Martin v. SkeelsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wellman, Admr. v. WalesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  2. Duchaine, B.N.F. v. RaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  3. Landry v. HubertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  4. Hall v. FletcherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API