Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided November 16, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

Honorable Jim Lendall State Representative 10625 Legion Hut Road Mabelvale, Arkansas 72103

Dear Representative Lendall:

This is in response to your request for an opinion concerning Amendment 7 to the Arkansas Constitution, and the circulation of initiative and referendum petitions. Specifically, you have noted that Amendment 7, under the section entitled "The Petition" and the paragraph entitled "Unwarranted Restrictions Prohibited", provides in pertinent part as follows:

No law shall be passed to prohibit any person or persons from giving or receiving compensation for circulating petitions,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Widmar v. VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API