Legal Opinion

Simons v. Burnham

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1894PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to Ingham. (Person, J.) Case for libel. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The parties to this action are rival merchants in the city of Lansing. It is alleged by the plaintiff that in October, 1889, the defendant sent-to various firms in other cities, with whom the plaintiff had business relations, clippings from a Lansing paper, showing real-estate transfers, including between ink lines, placed there by himself, the following: “ Benjamin F. Simons to Adeline A. Simons, lots 1, 2, and 8, block 150, Lansing, $5,000.” This clipping was attached to a half sheet of paper, on which was written the following, viz. (after the above quotation from the clipping, the words,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fry v. BennettThe Superior Court of New York City · 1851
  2. Newbold v. J. M. Bradstreet & SonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
  3. Edwards v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Huson v. DaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Fowler v. GilbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ledsinger v. BurmeisterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Burden v. Elias Bros. Big Boy RestaurantsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Lauder v. JonesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Quinn v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Hope-Jackson v. WashingtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API