Legal Opinion

Snowdell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 2002No. ED 80515PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE W. DRAPER III, Judge.

Donald Snowdell (hereinafter, “Movant”) appeals pro se from the judgment entered denying his post-conviction motion for DNA testing. Movant raises three points on appeal claiming error in that the motion court erred by: (1) allowing Movant’s appointed counsel to withdraw; (2) finding that Movant did not request testing previously and that the rape kit was available for testing; and (3) denying the motion without requiring the State to enter a formal show-cause order or motion to dismiss. We affirm.

Movant was convicted of forcible rape in November 1997. The evidence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ClaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  2. State v. ChambersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  4. State v. SinnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. State v. DaughertyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KinderMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. State v. TylerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Hudson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. WestcottMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Hudson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API