Legal Opinion
Reynolds and Reynolds Co. v. Universal Forms, Labels & Systems, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 19, 1997No. CV 97-1513 DT (SHx)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF DEFENDANTS DONNA BOULGER, LINDA KOLBECK, JULIA GARRETT, THERESA SCHLEGEL AND MARGIE MOLINO TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER RULE 12(B)(6) WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND.
TEVRIZIAN, District Judge.
Background
1.Factual Summary.
The First Amended Complaint alleges the following matters.
About December 31, 1996, Plaintiff Reynolds and Reynolds Company (“Reynolds”) purchased the assets of Vanier Graphics Corporation (“Vanier”). See First Amended Complaint ¶¶ 4, 22-23.
Defendant Universal Forms, Labels & Systems, Inc. (“Universal”) is a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. City of Redwood City, California and Albert v. Pinotti, Individually and Dba the People's Police PatrolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Russell v. LandrieuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Zaragosa v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- 11601 Wilshire Associates v. GrebowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Gen Ads, LLC v. BreitbartDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2006
- 11601 Wilshire Associates v. GrebowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Rolled Alloys, Inc. v. WallsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021