Legal Opinion

Riddle & Associates, P.C. v. Judith A. Kelly, Appeals Of: Edelman, Combs & Latturner, Cross-Appellee, and David L. Hartsell and Ross & Hardies

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 18, 2005No. 04-1509, 04-1637PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KANNE, Circuit Judge.

This case involves cross-appeals by two law firms over the imposition of — and failure to impose — sanctions under 28 U.S.C. § 1927. Edelman, Combs & Latturner (“Edelman”) was sanctioned by the district court and ordered to pay the plaintiff, Riddle & Associates (“Riddle”), the attorneys’ fees and costs arising out of the underlying declaratory judgment action. In a counterclaim in the same lawsuit, the district court declined the request by David L. Hartsell and Ross & Hardies (collectively, “Ross & Hardies”) to impose sanctions against Edelman. Thus', although the firm…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Curtis Bartlett v. John A. Heibl and John A. Heibl, Attorney at LawCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Ids Life Insurance Company and American Express Financial Advisors, Inc. v. Royal Alliance Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  3. Dean L. Buntrock v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Anna Mustafa v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Fednav International Ltd. v. Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Lamboy-Ortiz v. Ortiz-VelezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  4. Dal Pozzo, Kevin A. v. Richards Brick Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  5. Baca v. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API