Jimerson v. Rosenblum
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The ballot title is referred to the Attorney General for modification.
BALDWIN, J.
Petitioners seek review of the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition (IP) (2018), contending that the “yes” and “no” result statements and the summary do not comply with the requirements set out in ORS 250.035(2). We review the certified ballot title to determine whether it substantially complies with those requirements. See ORS 250.085(5) (setting out that standard). For the reasons explained below, we refer the ballot title to the Attorney General for modification of the summary.
IP 1…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wolf v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Conroy v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Berman v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2010
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jimerson v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016