Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Clingman v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 2001No. 00-118Published

1Concurrence

GOLDEN, J.,

specially concurring, with whom LEHMAN, C.J., joins.

[¶15] I write separately to address several matters not touched upon by the Court's opinion. First, in the State's briefing a question is raised whether Clingman's appeal of the district court's April 12, 2000, order denying his post-sentencing motion to withdraw his guilty plea is properly before the Court. The State does not question that Clingman has properly and timely perfected his appeal from the district court's judgment and sentence which was filed March 6, 2000; his notice of appeal from that judgment and sentence was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. Cerrato-ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Frederick BryeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Clark v. AlexanderWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Cooper v. Town of PinedaleWyoming Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API