Legal Opinion

Dice Corp. v. Bold Technologies

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 25, 2012No. Case No. 11-13578Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge.

In this intellectual property dispute, Plaintiff Dice Corporation alleges that Defendant Bold Technology accessed Plaintiffs servers and stole its software. Defendant denies that it did any such thing. Relying on deposition testimony, affidavits, *392and other evidence showing that it neither accessed Plaintiffs servers nor its software, Defendant now moves for summary judgment. Plaintiff opposes the motion. The opposition, however, is based on conclusory…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API