Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Peter

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 8, 1910PublishedCited by 6 opinions

CASE 83. — PETITION FOR MANDAMUS BY THE COMMONWEALTH BY ARTHUR E. HOPKINS AND OTHERS On petition filed in Court of Appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chiep Justice Nunn.

The record of this case was misplaced for some time, hence the delay in writing the opinion.

The county attorney of Jefferson county, Arthur E. Hopkins and Holland L. Anderson, revenue agents for the state at large, filed in this court their petition, asking a writ of mandamus to compel the defendant, Arthur Peter, as county judge of Jefferson county, to require the Fidelity Trust Company of Louisville, Ky., to file, as executor of the estates of Underwood, Hart, Walsh, Mackey, Barth, Bonnie, Parr, Leeds, and Bodine, with the county court clerk of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. ViersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Board Trustees Firemen's Pension Fund v. McCroryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  3. Commonwealth v. Gaulbert's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  4. Dant's Executors v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ohio River Contract Co. v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Rush v. DenhardtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Western Oil Refining Co. v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  4. Smith v. ShamburgerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  5. McGee v. WeissingerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API