Legal Opinion

Ohio River Contract Co. v. Gordon

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 26, 1916PublishedCited by 48 opinions

Petition for Writ of Prohibition.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hurt

Dismissing petition for writ of prohibition.

The Ohio Biver Contract Company, whom we will call the petitioner, is a corporation which was organized by and exists under the laws of the state of Indiana, and as such is qualified to‘sue and be sued in its corporate name. It maintained its principal place of business and all of its officers reside in the state of Indiana. Under a contract with the United States government, it was engaged in the work incident to the construction of a canal and a lock and dam upon a certain piece of land, which had been acquired by…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Western Life Indemnity Co. of Ill. v. RuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Rush v. DenhardtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Weaver v. ToneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  4. Montgomery v. ViersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  5. Renshaw v. CookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bender v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  3. Cox v. BradenKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Litteral v. Woods, JudgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. General Electric Co. v. CainKentucky Supreme Court · 2007

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API