Comprehensive Addiction Treatment Services, Inc. v. City & County of Denver
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge RULAND.
Plaintiffs, Comprehensive Addiction Treatment Services, Inc., (C.A.T.S.), Irene Rosenfeld, and Jerald B. Rosenfeld, appeal from the judgment of the district court upholding the denial of a use permit for the operation of its methadone treatment facility. We reverse.
C.A.T.S. is a Colorado corporation formed and operated for the purpose of providing drug addiction treatment services. The Rosenfelds are the owners of the real property on which C.A.T.S. operates its facility. Defendants (objectors) are all property owners in the same area as the C.A.T.S. facility.
C.A.T.S.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Humana, Inc. v. BOARD OF ADJUST. OF CITY OF LAKEWOODSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Sherman v. City of Colorado Springs Planning CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
- Neighbors for a Better Approach v. NepaColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thw Group, LLC v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014