Legal Opinion

Comprehensive Addiction Treatment Services, Inc. v. City & County of Denver

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1989No. 88CA1839PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge RULAND.

Plaintiffs, Comprehensive Addiction Treatment Services, Inc., (C.A.T.S.), Irene Rosenfeld, and Jerald B. Rosenfeld, appeal from the judgment of the district court upholding the denial of a use permit for the operation of its methadone treatment facility. We reverse.

C.A.T.S. is a Colorado corporation formed and operated for the purpose of providing drug addiction treatment services. The Rosenfelds are the owners of the real property on which C.A.T.S. operates its facility. Defendants (objectors) are all property owners in the same area as the C.A.T.S. facility.

C.A.T.S.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Humana, Inc. v. BOARD OF ADJUST. OF CITY OF LAKEWOODSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  2. Sherman v. City of Colorado Springs Planning CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Neighbors for a Better Approach v. NepaColorado Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thw Group, LLC v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API