Legal Opinion

Roemer, to Use v. Lancaster Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 11, 1936No. Appeal, 217PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

On May 23, 1935, Willis G. Kendig and Charles F. Bowman, the present owners of a judgment entered against the County of Lancaster on October 26, 1901, issued a scire facias requiring the county to show cause why the judgment “should not be revived and why the said plaintiffs ought not to have their execution against it,” etc.

The county answered, inter alia: “The said judgment having been entered October 26, 1901, and not having been revived since that time, although open on the records, cannot be proceeded on because the same is outlawed.” The issue thus raised was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. County of Lancaster v. FreyLancaster County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1889
  2. Camp v. JohnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Backestoss v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
  4. Wills v. GibsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brooks v. RudolphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Brooks v. RudolphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API