Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Rudolph

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 29, 1952No. Appeals, 58 and 59PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

On October 8, 1929, Mary A. Rudolph, now Mary A. Russell, the defendant and present appellant, executed two judgment notes, the one in favor of Alice A. Brooks and the other in favor of Richard Brooks. Judgment was entered on each of these notes on July 30, 1931, and on January 23, 1934, both judgments were marked of record to the use of Warren F. Brooks, the appellee. On October 30, 1950, the use-plaintiff is*23sued writs of scire facias to revive and continue the liens of these judgments. The defendant filed an affidavit of defense to each of the writs; and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Conrad's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Dowling v. McGregorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  3. Cusano v. RubolinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. McCracken v. First Reformed Presbyterian CongregationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  5. Hiestand v. Williamson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rosenbaum v. NewhoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Brooks v. RudolphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Carman v. Carman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1963
  4. Curley v. Lisman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1980
  5. Rosenbaum v. NewhoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API