Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Greenwood

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1979No. 15860PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

In this ease plaintiff appeals from a judgment below in favor of defendant, in which the court determined no contract or partnership to have existed between the parties. Defendant cross-appeals from the dismissal of his counterclaim. We affirm. No costs awarded.

In 1966, plaintiff (Harmon) became a part-time employee of Greenwood Service, a sole proprietorship owned and operated by defendant (Greenwood) in Nephi, Utah. Greenwood Service began as a tire service, but expanded to a GM automobile dealership in 1970. In 1968, Harmon became a full-time employee, and he and Greenwood…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Paul W. Larsen Contractor, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Valcarce v. BittersUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Reed v. MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Johnson v. Star Iron & Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  5. Chu v. RonstadtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown's Shoe Fit Co. v. OlchCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  2. Homestead Golf Club, Inc. v. Pride StablesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. Nu-Med USA, Inc. v. 4Life Research, L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Rohan v. BosemanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  5. Bloom Master Inc. v. Bloom Master LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API