Finn v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARRISON L. WINTER, Chief Judge:
Plaintiffs are eight Air Reserve Technicians employed by the federal government who seek judicial review of their job classifications. The district court held that it could not review the final classification decision of defendant United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM), reasoning that Congress generally deprived the federal courts of subject matter jurisdiction over such disputes when it enacted the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA), Pub.L. No. 95-454, 92 Stat. 1111 (codified, as amended, in various sections of Title 5, United States Code).…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Louis A. Carducci v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary, U.S. Treasury DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Bly v. McLeodCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Heath v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
- Chandler v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
- Olympic Marine Services, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
- Finn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Wilderson v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1992