Legal Opinion · Dissent

George Goff, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Steve Dailey, Superintendent of Clarinda Richard Huckins, Correctional Officer, Appellants/cross-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 15, 1993No. 92-1951, 92-2019Published

1DissentHeaney, Senior Circuit Judge

This appeal presents an issue of first impression in the courts of appeals: can a prison disciplinary board find an inmate guilty of violating a prison rule or regulation on something less than a preponder-*1443anee of the evidence? 1 The only circuit to have addressed this issue, albeit in dicta, was the Third, in which it indicated that

[i]f [the appellant] is correct in his assertion that [the prison regulation] provides for a burden of proof lower than a preponderance of the evidence, then it follows that an inmate can be punished for acts which he in all probability did not commit. We have…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States ex rel. Miller v. TwomeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API