Legal Opinion

In re J.D.B.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 2009No. 190A09PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWBY, Justice.

This case presents the issue of whether a juvenile who made incriminating revelations to law enforcement officers was in police custody such that the officers should have afforded him the protections of N.C.G.S. § 7B-2101(a), which codifies and expands for the juvenile context the safeguards set forth in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694 (1966). Because we hold that the Court of Appeals properly concluded that the juvenile was not in custody when he incriminated himself, we affirm the decision of that court.

Two juvenile petitions were filed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Koufman v. KoufmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. J. D. B. v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. State of Iowa v. Jesse John PearsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  3. In Re KDLCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. In re D.L.H.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  5. In re K.D.L.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API