Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Bowlegs

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 23, 1923No. 11838PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL, C.

This appeal comes up from the district court of Seminole county. The plaintiff in error, on Feb-ril ary 2, 1918, filed suit in ejectment in said district court against the defendant in error asking for possession of the S. % of S. W. % of N. E. % of S. W. % and S. E. % of S..W. %, less 7.07 acres for Wewoka town-site, in section 18, E., T. 8 N., R. 8 E., in Seminole county, and for rents and damages. She claimed title through a tax deed executed to her by the county treasurer of Seminole county on November 28, 1917, a copy 'of which deed was attached to the petition…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lowenstein v. SextonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. Blanchard v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Miller v. KimmelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Turman v. IngramSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hatfield v. MorelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Lairmore v. Board of Com'rs of Okmulgee CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. Westerheide v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Felt v. SchaubSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Sires v. ParriottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API