Legal Opinion

People v. Henriquez

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1986PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Term should be reversed and the matter remitted for consideration of the facts and the exercise of discretion (CPL 470.40 [2] [b]). Inasmuch as the order of the Appellate Term did not include a statement of whether the facts underlying the Criminal Court’s judgment were considered and determined to be established, we presume that the court did not consider or make any determination with respect to the facts (CPL 470.25 [2] [d]).

It was error for the Appellate Term to treat this matter as a calendar control dismissal within the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. RickertNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. DouglassNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. WingardNew York Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Holtzman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. ColonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. CileliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. People v. RoeschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. People v. HarperRochester City Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API