Missouri Military Academy v. McCollum
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DOERNER, Commissioner.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order sustaining defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s amended petition on the ground that it failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Since no contrary intent was indicated, the dismissal of the petition was a dismissal of plaintiff’s action, and therefore a final, appealable judgment. Frank v. Sinclair Refining Co., 363 Mo. 1054, 256 S.W.2d 793; White v. Sievers, 359 Mo. 145, 221 S.W.2d 118; Jones v. Williams, 357 Mo. 531, 209 S.W. 2d 907.
In view of the nature of the claimed deficiencies of the petition it…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- White v. SieversSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Wilt v. WaterfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Jones v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
- Basye v. AmbroseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
- Frank v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brenner v. Little Red School House, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Smith v. Consolidated School District No. 2Supreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- U.S. Suzuki Motor Corp. v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- International Plastics Development, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Berra v. Papin Builders, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.