Legal Opinion

Wilson, Close & Co. v. Pritchett

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 8, 1904PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dorchester County (Holland, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtSchmuckf.r, J.

The appellants sued the appellee, in the Circuit Court for Dorchester County, in assumpsit on a written contract for the sale of certain patent medicines and flavoring extracts. The appellee, as defendant, filed the general issue pleas and also a special plea asserting that the plaintiffs had procured the contract through fraud. The verdict and judgment having been for the defendant, the plaintiffs appealed. The record contains four exceptions to the Court’s rulings on evidence and one to its action on the prayers.

The plaintiffs are manufacturing druggists in Iowa City, Iowa, and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Spitze v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  2. Mayer v. . DeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Ferguson v. Rafferty, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clearfield County1889
  4. Morrison v. WhitesideCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
  5. Davis v. HamblinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Blinder v. MonaghanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  2. Sainsbury v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  3. Scarborough v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
  4. McGrath v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  5. Standard Motor Co. v. PeltzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API