Legal Opinion

In re Eisenberg

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 1941No. 20443Published

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, District Judge.

I fully covered the facts in my original opinion (D.C., 41 F.Supp. 482) wherein I reversed the referee and entered an order on the bankrupts. Upon reargument counsel for the bankrupts strenuously argued that before the order on the bankrupts can be made, the bankrupts’ ability to comply must be found as a fact by the referee and that the court itself cannot do so from the record.

In my opinion, I found as a fact that the assets or their proceeds were in their possession at the time of the bankruptcy. Oriel v. Russell, 278 U.S. 358, 49 S.Ct. 173, 73 L.Ed. 419, which…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Oriel v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Epstein v. SteinfeldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914
  3. Drakeford v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. In re StavrahnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  5. In Re H. Magen Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API