Legal Opinion

Ottofaro v. City of Hampton

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 10, 2003No. Record 020101PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell

I

The primary issues that we consider in an appeal of a judgment entered in a condemnation proceeding are whether a city condemned private property for a public purpose, and whether a city council’s condemnation resolution complied with the applicable law.

II

In September 1999, the City Council for the City of Hampton adopted a resolution that authorized the acquisition of several parcels of land, including two parcels owned by Frank J. Ottofaro and Dora J. Ottofaro (the landowners). The City filed a certificate of take against the Ottofaros’ property as permitted by Code §§ 33.1-119 through…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mumpower v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  2. City of Richmond v. CarnealSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  3. Nichols v. Central Virginia Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  4. Bristol Redevelopment & Housing Authority v. DentonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  5. Hamer v. School Board of the City of ChesapeakeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. County of Hawai'i v. C & J Coupe Family Ltd. PartnershipHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  2. HOFFMAN FAMILY v. City of AlexandriaSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  3. County of Hawai'i v. C & J Coupe Family Ltd. PartnershipHawaii Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API