Ottofaro v. City of Hampton
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell
I
The primary issues that we consider in an appeal of a judgment entered in a condemnation proceeding are whether a city condemned private property for a public purpose, and whether a city council’s condemnation resolution complied with the applicable law.
II
In September 1999, the City Council for the City of Hampton adopted a resolution that authorized the acquisition of several parcels of land, including two parcels owned by Frank J. Ottofaro and Dora J. Ottofaro (the landowners). The City filed a certificate of take against the Ottofaros’ property as permitted by Code §§ 33.1-119 through…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mumpower v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
- City of Richmond v. CarnealSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Nichols v. Central Virginia Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1925
- Bristol Redevelopment & Housing Authority v. DentonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
- Hamer v. School Board of the City of ChesapeakeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- County of Hawai'i v. C & J Coupe Family Ltd. PartnershipHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- HOFFMAN FAMILY v. City of AlexandriaSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
- County of Hawai'i v. C & J Coupe Family Ltd. PartnershipHawaii Supreme Court · 2008