Legal Opinion
Milliman, Inc. v. Roof
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided October 23, 2018No. Civil No. 3:18-cv-00012-GFVTPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Finally, in evaluating motions to compel arbitration, "Courts treat the facts as they would in ruling on a summary judgment." Diversicare Leasing Corp. v. Hutchinson , Civil Action No. 17-42-HRW, 2018 WL 771320, at *2 (E.D. Ky. Feb. 7, 2018) (quoting Kovac v. Superior Dairy, Inc. , 930 F.Supp.2d 857, 864 (N.D. Ohio 2013) ). Accordingly, the party opposing arbitration must show "a genuine issue of material fact as to the validity of the agreement to arbitrate." Great Earth Cos. Inc. v. Simons , 288 F.3d 878, 889 (6th Cir. 2002). The party opposing arbitration also has an evidentiary burden of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Haage v. ZavalaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
- Doug Ommen and Dan Watkins v. MilliMan, Inc., Kimberley Hiemenz, and Michael StrumSupreme Court of Iowa · 2020
- Richardson Vs. Dist. Ct. (Milliman, Inc.)Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
- Richardson v. Dist. Ct. (Mulligan)Nevada Supreme Court · 2022