Legal Opinion

Gooch v. Gooch

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 12, 1921No. 23,010PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 2; Thornton W. Sargent,'judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

Hattie Gooch brought this action against the defendants to recover damages for alienation of the affections of her husband, J. F. Gooch. An objection to the introduction of evidence under plaintiff’s petition was sustained, but the court on motion of the plaintiff granted her a new trial and from that order defendants appeal.

The defendants are the children of J. F. Gooch, by a former *417marriage, and in her petition plaintiff alleged that when she married their father and went to live at his home they used—

“Every effort and means to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. City of CherryvaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. City of Kansas City v. SlangstromSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  3. Luengene v. Consumers Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Howard v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  5. Pinson v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Farmers Grain & Supply Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  2. Carlgren v. SaindonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  3. Fields v. Anderson Cattle Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  4. Acock v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. Turner v. KentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API