Doe v. PRINCESS CRUISE LINES, LTD.
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration (DE # 57). Plaintiff has filed a Response (DE # 81) and Defendant has replied (DE # 86). After careful consideration of the parties’ arguments and the legal authorities cited therein, the Court determines that the motion should be denied.
I. Introduction
The facts, procedural history, and legal issues involved in this case have already been recounted in the Court’s Order Denying Motion to Compel Arbitration (DE # 55), and will not be fully…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rizalyn Bautista v. Star CruisesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Z.K. Marine, Inc. v. M/V ArchigetisDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1992
- Gregory v. Electro-Mechanical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Doe v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Lindora, LLC v. Isagenix International, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2016
- Doe v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011