Legal Opinion
Redevelopment Agency v. Gilmore
California Supreme Court
Decided June 13, 1985No. L.A. 31891PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
38 Cal.3d 790 (1985)
700 P.2d 794
214 Cal. Rptr. 904
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF BURBANK, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
WALTER L. GILMORE, JR., et al., Defendants and Appellants.
Docket No. L.A. 31891.
Supreme Court of California.
June 13, 1985.
COUNSEL
Irsfeld, Irsfeld & Younger, O'Neill & Huxtable, Richard L. Huxtable and Francis H. O'Neill for Defendants and Appellants.
John Briscoe, Sandi L. Nichols, Thomas B. Brown, Washburn & Kemp, Fadem, Berger & Norton, Michael M. Berger, Parkinson, Wolf, Lazar & Leo, Richard B. Wolf and Michael W. Connally as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Perris v. StamperCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016