Legal Opinion

GMAC MORTG. CORP. OF PA v. Buchanan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 2007PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

HUDOCK, J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal from an order denying a petition to set aside a sheriffs sale. We affirm.

¶ 2 As the trial court has explained, on October 28, 1987, Appellant Robert P. Buchanan executed a promissory note secured by a mortgage on a residential property located at 858 Dorward Court in Etters, Pennsylvania (York County). Mr. Buchanan defaulted on his obligations under the mortgage by ceasing to make the monthly payments that came due on or after April 1, 2004. Appellee GMAC Mortgage Corporation (GMAC) initiated a mortgage foreclosure action on October 18, 2004. A…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Paden v. Baker Concrete Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Thomas v. ElashSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Kaib v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Blue Ball National Bank v. BalmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. ZumarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Ferreri, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. LSF8 Master Particip. Trust v. Petrosky, J. &. D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. US Bank NA v. B R Penn Realty Owner LPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025
  5. LSF8 Master Particip. Trust v. Petrosky, J. &. D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API