Legal Opinion

Sampson v. Cottongim

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 16, 1933PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION op the Court by

Judge Richardson

Reversing.

The right to specific performance of a contract to convey land is the decisive question presented, herein. Such right is not an absolute one, hut rests entirely on judicial discretion, to he exercised according to settled principles of 'equity and not arbitrarily, yet always according to the facts of the particular case.

“An application for specific performance is an appeal to the sound discretion of the court and one of the principles which controls the exercise of this discretion is that specific performance of a contract will not be decreed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Klatch v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Justice v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. J. J. Newberry Co. v. FaulconerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Preece v. WolfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. Duff v. WilkingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Galloway Motor Co. v. Huffman's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  2. Louisville N. R. Co. v. Dry Branch Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Miller v. PraterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  4. Stubblefield v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  5. Calloway v. CallowayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API