Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Raiload v. King

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 2, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Logan

— Reversing.

During the years 1923 and 1924, the appellant made extensive improvements on its Cumberland Valley Divi sion, particularly in Knox ■ county, ■ Ky. • The improvements consisted of double-tracking its line with the grading made necessary by the work. It entered into a contract with the Nichols Construction Company to perform the work necessary in making the improvements. The contractor employed a number of men in its prosecution of the work. The appellee, Josiah King, was employed by the contractor, and it was his duty to operate a drilling rig, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Willis' Administratrix v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Cornett's Administrator v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. L. E. Meyers' Co. v. Logue's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  4. Howard v. Illinois Central RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. McMath's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Draper v. Louisville Nashville Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API