Louisville & Nashville Raiload v. King
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Logan
— Reversing.
During the years 1923 and 1924, the appellant made extensive improvements on its Cumberland Valley Divi sion, particularly in Knox ■ county, ■ Ky. • The improvements consisted of double-tracking its line with the grading made necessary by the work. It entered into a contract with the Nichols Construction Company to perform the work necessary in making the improvements. The contractor employed a number of men in its prosecution of the work. The appellee, Josiah King, was employed by the contractor, and it was his duty to operate a drilling rig, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Willis' Administratrix v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Cornett's Administrator v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- L. E. Meyers' Co. v. Logue's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Howard v. Illinois Central RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. McMath's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Draper v. Louisville Nashville Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941