Legal Opinion

Labar v. Lindstrom

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 21, 1924No. 23,890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, O.

This is an action by the vendee to rescind a contract for the purchase of a parcel of land in the city of Minneapolis for false representations concerning the property, and the sole question presented is whether the findings of fact justify the conclusion of law that plaintiff is not entitled to rescind.

The court found that defendants represented “that the dwelling house upon said premises was first class throughout in materials and workmanship”; that plaintiff relied thereon in part in making the purchase; that by reason of defective material and workmanship portions of the roof…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ludowese v. AmidonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Pennington v. RobergeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Lindquist v. GibbsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Drake v. Fairmont Drain Tile & Brick Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Straabe v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Capital Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ConveyWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Saupe v. St. Paul Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Jackson v. BuesgensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API