Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

McNaughton v. Charleston Charter School for Math & Science, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 28, 2015No. Appellate Case 2012-212451; 27490Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Pleicones

I concur in part and dissent in part. I conclude that there is some slight evidence to support the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motions for directed verdict and JNOV on McNaughton’s breach of contract claim, and therefore concur in the majority’s affirmance of this issue. I dissent from those portions of the opinion which uphold the special damages award and the attorneys’ fee award.

In order to recover special damages in this breach of contract suit, McNaughton was required to prove that appellant

[w]as clearly warned of the probable existence of unusual circumstances or that because of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shivers v. John H. Harland Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Stern & Stern Associates v. TimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Cornelius v. Oconee CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API